Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Andrews v. Evolve 7 Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Samuel Brady Andrews
Defendant:
Evolve 7 Inc., Evolve 11 Inc., Jigar "Jay" Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Muhammad v. Pride Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03047
Plaintiff:
Yadullahi Muhammad, Michael Asencio and Jahod Boynton
Defendant:
Pride Hospitality LLC and Jai Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Patel et al v. State Farm LLoyds et al
as 4:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Anil Jay Patel and Dharmisthaben Patel
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds and Michael J Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VANEGAS v. PATEL et al
as 3:2021cv20319
Plaintiff:
MILTON ARDON VANEGAS
Defendant:
JAY PATEL and KRAUSZER'S FOOD STORE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terry v. Grissinger et al
as 8:2021cv02258
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dwayne Terry
Defendant:
Holly Grissinger, Eric Ebber, Sonya Nazal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Patel
as 1:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Lee Samule Antoine and Antoine Samule Lee
Defendant:
Jay Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varadakar v. Tandoori Restaurant Corp. et al.
as 7:2021cv05189
Defendant:
Jay Patel, Tandoori Restaurant Corp. doing business as Indi-Q Restaurant and Bharat Patel
Plaintiff:
Pranab Varadakar
WYNDHAM FRANCHISOR, LLC v. AIRPORT HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02077
Defendant:
AIRPORT HOSPITALITY, LLC and JAY PATEL
Plaintiff:
WYNDHAM FRANCHISOR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patel et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv06985
Defendant:
Pax Labs Inc, Philip Morris USA Inc, E-Cig & Vape Depot and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Patel and Jay Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
