Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Woods v. DCFS et al
as 2:2015cv02240
Plaintiff:
Zamie Woods
Defendant:
DCFS, Jay Scott, Thomas E Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay Scott Cohen v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jay Scott Cohen
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation , Nordic PCL Construction, Marriott Resorts Hospitality Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jay Scott Cohen v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02560
Plaintiff:
Jay Scott Cohen
Defendant:
Does, Hyatt Corporation, Marriott Resorts Hospitality Corporation and others
In re: Jay Scott Brown
as 2:2014rd00032
Plaintiff:
Jay Scott Brown
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jay Scott Cohen v. Oakley Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04310
Plaintiff:
Jay Scott Cohen
Defendant:
Does and Oakley Inc
Macon County, Illinois, et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registrat, et al
as 13-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MACON COUNTY, ILLINOIS, by and through Jay Scott State's Attorney for Macon County and MARY A. EATON, Macon County Recorder of Death
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA and others
US v. Jessie Scott
as 10-6647
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESSIE SCOTT, a/k/a Jay Scott
Christopher Kennedy v. Jay Scott, et al
as 09-1170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER S. KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY SCOTT, Macon County Assistant States Attorney, JERRY DAWSON, Macon County Sheriff, SERGEANT BUSCH, Macon County Jail, Assistant Warden & Sheriff and others
Kennedy v. Scott et al
as 2:2008cv02255
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Kennedy
Defendant:
Jay Scott, Jerry Dawson, Larry . Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roden et al v. Robinson Helicopters, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jay Scott Roden, Kimberly D. Roden and Kimberly D. Roden
Defendant:
Robinson Helicopters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
