Cases 21 - 30 of 223
William Davis, Jr. v. W. Britt
as 19-6172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HUNTER, PRJ, JAMES W. GARNETT, JR., PRJ, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, USAG and others
Rogers v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv01526
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crowford, Russell Hott, Jefferson B. Sessions, III and others
Petitioner:
Syl Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Todd v. Sessions et al
as 6:2018cv03224
Defendant:
State of Washington, James L Robart, Zachary J Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robertson v. Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
James P. Robertson, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson B. Sessions, III and John Doe 1 Through 21
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robertson v. Sessions et al
as 7:2018cv00507
Plaintiff:
James P. Robertson, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson B. Sessions, III and John Doe 1 Through 21
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Maryland v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv02849
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, Charles P. Rettig, Alex M. Azar and others
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mena v. Sessions, III et al
as 1:2018cv01169
Respondent:
Thomas D. Homan, Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Immigration Center of America-Farmville and others
Petitioner:
Francisco Alberto Mena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
