Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Marcum v. Laughterdale County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul Marcum
Defendant:
Laughterdale County Sheriff's Office
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. LCDF
as 3:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul Marcum
Defendant:
LCDF, Lauderdale County, Mississippi, Greater Meridian Health and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunnavant v. Kilgore
as 1:2019cv02053
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore
Petitioner:
Jeffery Paul Dunnavant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. USA
as 3:2017cv00461
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffery Paul Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Horstman v. Tate et al
as 3:2013cv04561
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul Horstman
Defendant:
Harold Tate, K. Hill, Amber Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAUL et al v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PAUL, CLEARSYSTEMS and FORD MOTOR CO.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PAUL v. SAWYER et al
as 2:2013cv00268
Defendant:
BAYLESS, J.F. CARAWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PAUL et al v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2013cv00016
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
CLEARSYSTEMS and JEFFERY PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Paul v. The Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv09982
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
The Bureau of Prisons and McDonald's Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Paul v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2012cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Best Buy, Big Lots Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
