Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Taylor v. Centurylink, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Taylor
Defendant:
Centurylink, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DETSCHELT v. NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DETSCHELT
Defendant:
NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT and JEFFREY M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Eckerd Corporation
as 5:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Taylor, II
Defendant:
Eckerd Corporation doing business as Rite Aid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Taylor v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY A. TAYLOR
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Taylor
as 22-1442
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT TAYLOR, AKA Roach Taylor, AKA Jeffrey Scott Taylor, AKA Jeff Scott Taylor, AKA Jeffrey Taylor, AKA Jeffrey Scott
United States v. Taylor
as 22-1392
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT TAYLOR
Burkleo v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv02509
Plaintiff:
Jason David Burkleo
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Taylor, Joshua Gatto and Town of Atherton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42121
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PAUL TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jeffrey Taylor
as 21-35310
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY R. TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
