Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05990
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Chad M Enright and Allyson Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05714
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Monica Capps and Dawn Michelle Fleetwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Justin Hickox v. Eric Tice, et al
as 20-3185
Defendant / Appellee:
SETH ELLIS, DAN CARO, JEFFREY SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. HICKOX
Sutcliffe et al v. Bernese et al
as 4:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Lonnie Bernese, Waterstreet Enterprises and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Sutcliffe and Lori Sutcliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DANIEL GEHLMANN, OFFICER HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCIANO-APONTE v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv06486
Plaintiff:
BRYAN JESUS LUCIANO-APONTE
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, ALLEN G. JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
