Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Liu et al v. Studio Nails & Spa, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv09128
Plaintiff:
Al Ping Liu
Defendant:
Studio Nails & Spa, Inc., Hartsdale Floris Spa, and Nails Inc., Kyung Sil Ahn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maldonado v. Forever Kitchen Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01973
Defendant:
Jennifer Doe, Forever Kitchen Inc. and Judy Smith
Plaintiff:
Ubaldo Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roach v. Evergreen Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00077
Defendant:
Evergreen Financial Services Inc, Jennifer Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Roach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Goad v. Doe et al
as 5:2013cv00063
Defendant:
Jennifer Doe, Does 1 thru 50, Robert Kinsey and others
Plaintiff:
David Goad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LETOURNEAU v. BIDEN et. al.
as 1:2012cv01713
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH LETOURNEAU
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., THOMA, JAMES KENNETH CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Settle v. Accounts Receivable Management Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02604
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Settle
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. , Laurie Morris and Jennifer Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv01252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Church v. Oklahoma Corr. Industries, et al
as 11-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L.A. CHURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES SERVICES, CELL FOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Church v. Oklahoma Correctional Industries et al
as 5:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
William L Church
Defendant:
Oklahoma Correctional Industries, Oklahoma Correctional Industries Services, Cell For and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
