Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Thomas v. Booher et al
as 3:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas
Respondent:
Superintendent Booher, District Attorney of York County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. USA
as 4:2023cv00444
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas Watkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas v. Shaw et al
as 7:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Shaw and Captain Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Waterman et al
as 7:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
G.L. Waterman, Ryan Zaidema, Mary Jane Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Christian v. Sergeant Thomas
as 22-6587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CHRISTIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT JEROME THOMAS, OFFICER CARL CARBAUGH, LIEUTENANT LADEJA MASON and others
Anderson v. Unknown
as 3:2019cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
Unknown, Moore, B. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv04830
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Kelly et al
as 6:2019cv06108
Defendant:
Jane Doe/Nurse Amanda, Mr. Jackson, Wendy Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Loving et al
as 7:2019cv00513
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
George Lee Loving and Major Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jerome Thomas West and Patrick Wayne Wokulich
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
