Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Gary Robinson v. Jerry Higgins, et al
as 23-5933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY N. HIGGINS, JUDGE MARY M. SHAW, CAROLE C. SCHNEIDER and others
Gerald Lawrence McClean v. RHJ of Mount Airy Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07813
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lawrence McClean
Defendant:
RHJ OF MOUNT AIRY INC, JERRY N Key, Emmanuel Anthony Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Alfred v. Dixon
as 1:2023cv21892
Plaintiff:
Jerry N. Alfred
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennard v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Jerry N. Dennard
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Robinson v. Higgins et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry N. Higgins, Mary Shaw, Carole C. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Kimner v. Stoney et al
as 2:2022cv02943
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant:
Lori D. Stoney, Alex B. Cash, Suzanne Groft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker et al v. U S A A General Indemnity Co
as 2:2022cv05064
Plaintiff:
Jerry N. Baker, Rebecca Baker and Jerry N Baker
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company and U S A A General Indemnity Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nobles v. McDonough
as 22-1910
Claimant:
JERRY N. NOBLES
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Orlando Malone v. Carl Petty, et al
as 22-5394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL F. PETTY, Bradley Co, Assistant District Attorney, CARROLL L. ROSS, Trial Judge, JERRY N. ESTES and others
Robinson v. Higgins
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jerry N Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
