Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Joshua Durr v. Officer Royal, et al
as 26-1883
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DURR
Defendant:
OFFICER ROYAL and JERRY THOMPSON
Thompson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv03722
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jerry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Thompson v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jerry Thompson
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, Dawn Buss and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Glenn et al
as 4:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
Steven Craig Andrews
Defendant:
Officer Alexander Glenn, Sgt Marc T Jennings, Jerry Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
JERRY THOMPSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00961
Petitioner:
Jerry Thompson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karimu v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
William Karimu
Defendant:
Jerry Thompson, Anthony Luckey, Travis Judy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Harris v. Roy Cooper
as 21-7102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY A. HARRIS
Plaintiff:
GRANT RUFFIN HAZE, III, LINWOOD EARL DUFFIE, KEVIN MCQUEEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, JOHN GODFREY and MARSHALL PIKE
Livingston et al v. City of Bartlesville Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Defendant:
Tom Holland, Steven Silver, Bartlesville Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Pouncil and Michael Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03182
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Plaintiff:
Jerry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
