Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Adlife Marketing and Communications Co., Inc. v. Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC et al
as 8:2019cv01053
Plaintiff:
Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. and Adlife Marketing and Communications Co. Inc.
Defendant:
Restaurant Depo, LLC, Jetro Holdings, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Goodman, James et al v. Restaurant Depot, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00399
Plaintiff:
Dominic Schroeder and James Goodman
Defendant:
Jetro Holdings LLC and Restaurant Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Esfhani v. Jetro Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sedighe Sharifi Esfhani
Defendant:
RD America, LLC and Jetro Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jetro Holdings. LLC v Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv04000
Plaintiff:
Jetro Holdings. LLC
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Breeders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Caccavelli et al v. Jetro Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07306
Plaintiff:
Marisa Caccavelli and Lee Prophet
Defendant:
Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises, LLC, Jetro Holdings, LLC and Restaurant Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Bowman et al
as 2:2017mc00007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lori Elizabeth Bowman
Garnishee:
Jetro Holdings LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
