Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Miller et al v. Georgia Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jill Miller, Wayne Miller and Matthew Miller
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Transportation, Pittman Construction Company and CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Butler v. Tidwell et al
as 4:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Terry Spangler, Ronald Wesley Tidwell, Zachery A Ressler and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonel Martinez v. Kathy Litteral, et al
as 20-5798
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA DIXON, SARAH PRATER, JILL MILLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Butler v. Tidwell et al
as 6:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Terry Spangler, Ronald Wesley Tidwell, Zachery A Ressler and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearer v. Miller et al
as 0:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Jill Miller and Dr. Frederick Kemen, MD
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Shearer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny McGowan, Jr. v. CoreCivic, et al
as 19-5172
Defendant / Appellee:
MARQUETTA GOLDEN, Sued in their individual and official capacities, TANESHA DOUGLAS-ROBINSON, Unit Manager, JILL MILLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY L. MCGOWAN, JR.
Defendant:
CORECIVIC, et al.
Martinez v. Litteral
as 0:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Leonel Martinez
Defendant:
Kathy Litteral, Jill Miller, Carla Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Litteral
as 5:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Leonel Martinez
Defendant:
Kathy Litteral, Jill Miller, Carla Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. McGowan, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, FNU Dietz, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
