Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Collins v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al.
as 25-4716
Plaintiff:
JIM COLLINS, Regent
Defendant:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, CLAIRE MILLER, DANIEL SADOWAY, husband and others
Collins v. Miller et al
as 4:2025cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jim Collins
Defendant:
Claire Miller, Unknown Miller, Daniel Sadoway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 4:2025cv00010
Defendant:
University of Arizona, Marie Elizabeth Teemant, Margaret J Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly and Jim Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Jim Collins
Defendant:
Unknown Tax, University of Arizona, Unknown Sadoway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Marion County et al
as 3:2024cv03035
Defendant:
Jim Collins and Marion County
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Marion County et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marion County and Jim Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Collins v. Netherton et al
as 4:2021cv00140
Defendant:
Onyeka Udeozor, Jude, Jasmine Soria Sears and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Collins and Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Barber et al
as 4:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Onyeka Udeozor, Jude, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv10573
Plaintiff:
MELISSA RICHARDSON and JIM COLLINS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leek (ID 63523) v. Owegbo et al
as 5:2015cv03017
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Leek
Defendant:
Innocent Owegbo, Rex Prior, Jim Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
