Cases 31 - 40 of 610
Bhattarai et al v. Hood et al
as 3:2019cv00560
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Frances Robertson, Dorothy Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Dipa Bhattarai and Tyler Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minor v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2019cv00155
Plaintiff:
Otis Minor
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Officer Bryan Sullivant, Attorney General Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benoman v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2019cv00102
Respondent:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility and Attorney General Jim Hood
Petitioner:
Christopher Deshone Benoman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronk v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ronk
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Commissioner Pelicia Hall
Interested Party:
Terryl Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2019cv00095
Petitioner:
Kacy Fonteze Williams
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
State of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 3:2019cv00353
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Willis v. Hood
as 4:2019cv00071
Respondent:
Attorney General Jim Hood
Petitioner:
Derrick Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Hall et al
as 4:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Jim Hood, Marshal Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCreary v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Forrest County Circuit Court, Jim Hood, State of Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James E. McCreary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Errington et al
as 1:2019cv00052
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Joe Errington
Plaintiff:
Julius Scott Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
