Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PS) Shaw v City of Portola et al
as 2:2025cv02461
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Shaw
Defendant:
City of Portola, Steve Gross, Susan Scarlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. Commonwealth Asset Service, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jim Murphy and Mary Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Commonwealth Asset Service, LLC, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Litton Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rehal v. Giarrante et al
as 1:2013cv04145
Plaintiff:
Manjit Rehal
Defendant:
Thomas Giarrante, Jim Murphy, John Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nichols v. Murphy et al
as 0:2013cv00515
Plaintiff:
David Henry Nichols
Defendant:
Jim Murphy , City of Farmington and Prosecutor for the City of Farmington
John Dickson, Jr. v. Bonnie Jone
as 11-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BONNIE L. JONES, Honorable Judge, in her official & individual capacity, HONORABLE JUDGE BRYANT SUGG, in his official & individual capacity, JANE DOE, Honorable Special Justice, in her official & individual capacity and others
Rafael Perez-Rodriguez v. Patt Donaldson, et al
as 11-2252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PATT DONALDSON and JIM MURPHY
Perez-Rodriguez v. Donaldson et al
as 3:2011cv03106
Plaintiff:
Rafael Perez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Patt Donaldson and Jim Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
