Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vargas v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vargas v. USA
as 1:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
The Estate of Joel Vargas Gonzalez v. American Security Insurance Company
as 8:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vargas v. USA
as 1:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Vargas v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01575
Plaintiff:
Jesus Joel Vargas
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01541
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez, Jesus Joel Vargas, Juan Manuel Flores, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC
as 2:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC
Plaintiff:
Joel Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VARGAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81042
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL VARGAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Joel Vargas, et al
as 20-40040
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGELICA MARIA VARGAS and JOEL VARGAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Cuello (Orbe)
as 16-3832
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arismendy Cuello, AKA Cheito, Catherine Ricart, AKA Cathy, Joel Vargas and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jonathan Orbe, AKA Jigga
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
