Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Starr v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 8:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Edgar Starr
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union, Mary McDuffe and John Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zachery Keesee v. Andrew Johnson, et al
as 22-1819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zachery Scott Keesee
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Johnson, Detective, Conway Police Department, James Burroughs, Deputy Marshall, Conway Police Department, Jason Cole, ATF, Colorado and others
Keesee v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Zachery Scott Keesee
Defendant:
Andrew Johnson, James Burroughs, Jason Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peltz v. USA
as 4:2016cv01076
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Collins Peltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jason Procknow v. Hugh Curry, et al
as 15-2046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Procknow
Defendant - Appellee:
Hugh Curry, Brian Rundquist, Matt Ondrey and others
Collins v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
as 4:2012cv01847
Plaintiff:
John Collins
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Procknow v. Curry et al
as 0:2012cv00971
Plaintiff:
Jason Procknow
Defendant:
Hugh Curry, Brian Rundquist, Matt Ondrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
John Collins
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Walker et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2011cv01654
Plaintiff:
Benito Walker, William Luce, Jr., Barbara Austin and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, Solutia Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alexander v. Rogers et al
as 4:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Duke Alexander
Defendant:
John Collins Rogers and William Watt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
