Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01743
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BLOUNT v. SORBER et al
as 2:2020cv05283
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
JOHN M. BLOUNT and JOHN BLOUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blount v. USA
as 2:2019cv01414
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Steven Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stone v. Harley Marine Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00413
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Stone
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Harley Marine Gulf, LLC, City of Houston, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. John Blount
as 17-30623
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN STEVEN BLOUNT
Blount v. USA
as 2:2016cv01558
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Steven Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BLOUNT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv02838
Petitioner:
JOHN M. BLOUNT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blount v. Young et al
as 5:2012ct03072
Plaintiff:
John H. Blount
Defendant:
Rueben F. Young, Michael A. Hardee and Milton D. Westberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOUNT v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
as 2:2011cv58007
Plaintiff:
JOHN G BLOUNT
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
