Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 738
Williams v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3582
Plaintiff: JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant: MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, O. NAVARRO and others
WILLIAMS v. HUTTON et al
as 1:2024cv06563
Plaintiff: JOHN L. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: PTL. WILLIAM HUTTON, PTL. S. O'HALLORAN, B. FIDUCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff: John W. Williams
Defendant: Gavin Newsom, Jeffrey Macomber, Tammy Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner: John K Williams
Respondent: Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00772
Petitioner: John William Williams
Respondent: Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Ritenour
as 24-50298
Plaintiff: John Bernard Williams, III
Defendant: John Joseph Ritenour, Jr. and Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, Consumer Protection Division, Law Enforcement Division, and Civil Rights Division, Hate Crimes
Williams v. CDCR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv01856
Plaintiff: John W. Williams
Defendant: CDCR and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff: Raymond Aigbekaen and Raymond L. Aigbekaen
Defendant: USA, Collette Peters, John F. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: John Williams, III
as 24-1213
Petitioner: In re: JOHN ROBERT WILLIAMS, III

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?