Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROSS v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Defendant:
JOHN C NIVISON, BRYCE TORRENSON, ANDREW MCCORMACK and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Costlow, et al
as 24-1593
Defendant:
JOHN C. NIVISON, BANGOR, ME, FREDERICK F. COSTLOW and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. CHASE
Ross v. Woodcock, et al
as 24-1587
Defendant:
2 UNKNOWN PROBATION OFFICERS, BRYCE TURGENSON, Probation Officer, ANDREW MCCORMACK, Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHASE v. COSTLOW et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L CHASE
Defendant:
FREDERICK F COSTLOW, CITY OF BANGOR, JOHN C NIVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Murphy v. McAliffe et al
as 4:2009cv00440
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Steven J McAliffe, James R Muirhead, John A Woodcock, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
