Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hiaasen v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Robert Brian Hiaasen
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Leland Beamer, John Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91166
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Travis Warren v. Ole Hansen, et al
as 20-35053
Defendant:
DAVID CALDER, MD, LANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
GARTH GULICK, JOHN BATTLE, NP and OLE HANSEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS DAVID WARREN
(PC) Edsall v. Battle et al
as 2:2018cv01858
Plaintiff:
John Arthur Henry Edsall, Sr.
Defendant:
D Wheeler, John Battle and Jerry Riggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Battles et al
as 2:2016cv13857
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Defendant:
John Battles and Laverna D. Ricks
Anderson v. Fifer et al
as 6:2016cv02044
Plaintiff:
Adam Steven Anderson
Defendant:
John Battle, Chris Bedsaul, Dan Buckwald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laury v. Jevirell et al
as 2:2015cv13365
Plaintiff:
Darrin Laury
Defendant:
Mechelle Jevirell, John Battles, Robert Weiss and others
Moore et al v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2009cv00710
Plaintiff:
Fred Moore, Tanya Moore and Karmen Shaver
Defendant:
City of DeSoto, City of DeSoto, Erin Blust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARRINGTON et al v. Bryan et al
as 5:2007cv00386
Plaintiff:
RONALD ARRINGTON, Ruby Arrington, Curtis Barnes and others
Defendant:
Paula Priscilla Bryan, Deborah Gaines, Gladys Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
