Cases
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv03367
Petitioner: PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LLC, MICROBILT CORPORATION, PHILIP N BURGESS and others
Respondent: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Princeton Alternative Funding, LLC et al
as 4:2023mc00005
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING, LLC, MICROBILT CORPORATION, PHILLIP N. BURGESS, JR. and others
Respondent: Steven Bellah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Princeton Alternative Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00841
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Princeton Alternative Funding, LLC, Microbilt Corporation, Philip N. Burgess, Jr. and others
Interested Party: JOE KENARY
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2023mc00025
Respondent: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Petitioner: PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING, LLC, MICROBILT CORPORATION, PHILIP N BURGESS and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv12971
Defendant: John Cook, Jr., PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LLC, MICROBILT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Arthur Moler v. Christopher Mabe, et al
as 20-5077
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN O'BRIEN, Chief Administrator DSCC, L. VAUGHN, OIC SHU Officer, THOMAS BRANSCUM, Camp Secretary and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARTHUR FLEMMING MOLER
Moler v. Mabe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00203
Petitioner: Arthur Flemming Moler
Respondent: Jason Sickler, Christopher Mabe, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?