Cases 31 - 40 of 6,237
Bennett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Cortez Bennett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Marion Wade Frye
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Director Bryan Sterling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tomlin v. Smolke et al
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tomlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Smolke, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Corey Demoris Gilbert
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Churchwell v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Lavonta Churchwell
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Irving et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Trevelle Alexander Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Antionette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Doty et al
as 9:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Knight, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Doty, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Cobb
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Rivera Latroy Peoples
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
