Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe A et al v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2022cv10209
Plaintiff:
John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C and others
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Interested Party:
Alyson Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munn et al v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2017cv05296
Plaintiff:
John Munn , Darrell Moore , Marco Gomez and others
Defendant:
City of Aurora and Jo Ann Osberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markus Buchanan v. Tarry Williams, et al
as 16-4088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARKUS N. BUCHANAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, KENNAN YOUNG, Lieutenant, CHARLES BEST and others
Jacoby Garrett v. John Doe (B), et al
as 16-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacoby Garrett
Defendant - Appellee:
John Doe (B), John Doe (C), John Doe (D) and others
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc. v. John Does et al
as 2:2015cv03762
Defendant:
"July", "Kool", "Magoo" and others
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc.
Garrett v. Doe (B) et al
as 2:2015cv01004
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Garrett
Defendant:
John Doe (B), John Doe (C), John Doe (D) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Doe (B) et al
as 4:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Garrett
Defendant:
John Doe (B), John Doe (C), John Doe (D) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Higdon v. TN, et al
as 14-6145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES T. HIGDON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EIGHTH DISTRICT, WILLIAM PAUL PHILLIPS, Individually and Officially as Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
