Cases 21 - 30 of 2,032
Krul v. DeJoy
as 24-314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE M. KRUL
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS KELLY, LISA LYNCH, JOHN DOE(S) and others
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Almonte v. Doe et al
as 7:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Joel Almonte
Defendant:
P.O. "John" Doe, John Doe#s, Area S.G.T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. AHMAD et al
as 2:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
DIVANTE WORTHEN
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD AHMAD, ASSAD MOHAMMAD, AMINU SULEMANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Turner v. Heisner, et al.
as 24-583
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN GLEN TURNER
Respondent / Appellee:
R. A. HEISNER, BRYAN BIRKHOLZ and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe(s) 1-11
Lester et al v. Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kara Lester and Lana Lester
Defendant:
Tyler Sizemore, John Doe(s) and Wyoming County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Inoa v. Dziduch
as 24-269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE INOA
Defendant / Appellee:
L.T. DZIDUCH, L.T. ENSER, L.T. DELANEY and others
Defendant:
ATTICA C.F., Medical Personel John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s) and ATTICA C.F., Office of Mental Health, John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
