Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Enstrom et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Betsy Enstrom, John Stana, Kevin Arias-Watkins and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., The Board of Directors of SAS Institute, Inc., The Retirement Committee of SAS Institute Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Baird et al v. Steel Dynamics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baird, Michael Sanderson and Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Steel Dynamics Inc., The Board of Directors of Steel Dynamics Inc., The Steel Dynamics Inc. Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Colston et al v. Ameritas Holding Company et al
as 4:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
Amber Colston, Willis Bramwell and Roseann Blessing
Defendant:
Ameritas Holding Company, The Board of Directors of Ameritas Holding Company, The Ameritas 401(k) Retirement Plan Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Erica Barrett, et al v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., et al
as 23-2501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Erica Barrett, Kathleen Vincent, Connie Enderle and others
Defendant / Appellee:
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., The Board of Directors of O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., O'Reilly Automotive 401(k) Plan Investment Committee and others
Perkins v. United Surgical Partners
as 23-10375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Amanda Perkins, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Heather C. Holst, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Terry J. Williams, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United Surgical Partners International, Inc., Retirement Plan Administration Committee of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. and John Does 1-30
Fitzpatrick et al v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Fitzpatrick, Michael W. Peters and Mary E. Becklun
Defendant:
Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc., The Board of Directors of Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc., Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. Participant Directed Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Chad Rocke et al v. Allianz Asset Management of America, L.P. et al
as 8:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chad Rocke and Christopher Collins
Defendant:
Allianz Asset Management of America, L.P., Administrative Plan Committee of the Allianz Asset Management of America, L.P. 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan, Retirement Plan Committee of the Allianz Asset Management of America, L.P. 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MCLACHLAN et al v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS et al
as 2:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. McLachlan and Alex D. Graham
Defendant:
International Union of Elevator Constructors, The General Executive Board of the International Union of Elevator Constructors, The Board of Trustees of the Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Lard et al v. Marmon Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04332
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R. Lard, John G. Juergens, Gerald L. Robinson and others
Defendant:
Marmon Holdings, Inc., The Board of Directors of Marmon Holdings, Inc., Marmon Retirement Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
