Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Santiago v. Tykol et al
as 6:2021cv01715
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Hernandez Santiago
Defendant:
Samuel Tykol, City of Eugene, John Doe Supervisors 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lastra v. Pudovkin et al
as 1:2021cv07759
Plaintiff:
James Lastra and Jamie Lastra
Defendant:
Patrick Doe, Vlad Pudovkin, Brian Travis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spence v. City of Martinsburg, West Virginia et al
as 3:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Spence, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Martinsburg, West Virginia, Chief Maury Richards, Patrolman N. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. City of Martinsburg WV et al
as 3:2020cv00163
Defendant:
John Doe(s) 1-3, Chief Maury Richards, City of Martinsburg WV and others
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Spence, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Fowler et al
as 1:2018cv03767
Plaintiff:
Johnny Paul Pitts
Defendant:
Tommie L. Fowler, John Doe(s) 1-3, Tony Hailes, Sr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Ainsley v. Craig et al
as 1:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Ainsley
Defendant:
Police Officer Patrick Craig, P.O. Gabriel Cuevas, Brian Feeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
