Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Robert Doyle
as 18-12993
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT JOHN DOYLE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
DOYLE v. WARDEN
as 5:2016cv00483
Petitioner:
JOHN DOYLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harding v. Department of Children and Families for Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2016cv12047
Plaintiff:
Debra Harding
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families for Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Marylou Sudders, Linda S. Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doyle v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Doyle
Defendant:
State of Georgia, County of Stephens, Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massee v. Doyle et al
as 4:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
Michael J Massee
Defendant:
John Doyle and Griselda Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harding v. The Department of Children and Families et al
as 1:2015cv14250
Defendant:
The Department of Children and Families, Marylou Sudders, Linda S. Spears and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Harding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ikker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06975
Defendant:
William Bratton, City of New York, Mayor William DeBlasio and others
Plaintiff:
Rajah S. Ikker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Perras, et al
as 15-2288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH PERRAS, STEPHANIE WENNERBERG, KATHLEEN M. DOHERTY and others
Davis v. Perras et al
as 1:2015cv11670
Plaintiff:
Bernard Davis
Defendant:
Sarah Perras, Stephanie Wennerberg , Kathleen M. Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
