Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Kevin Wickstrom, et al v. Air Line Pilots Association, International
as 25-1036
Plaintiff:
JOHN ELLIS, ERIK W. WICHMANN, JAMES R. BREITSPRECHER and others
Defendant:
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
Bailey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00392
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Ellis Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Edwards v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01844
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Edwards
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Costa v. Ellis et al
as 1:2024cv12002
Defendant:
John Ellis and Postal Service United States
Plaintiff:
Ashley Thoma Costa
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Costa v. Ellis et al
as 1:2024cv12001
Plaintiff:
Ashley Thoma Costa
Defendant:
John Ellis and Postal Service United States
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Costa v. Ellis et al
as 3:2024cv12002
Defendant:
John Ellis and Postal Service United States
Plaintiff:
Ashley Thoma Costa
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Johnson v. Payne
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
M Jackson, III and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. Gay et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Welch
Defendant:
Dee David Gay, Sumner County Jail, Tara A. Wyllie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haag Engineering Co v. Ellis et al
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Haag Engineering Co
Defendant:
John Ellis, Ellis Forensics, LLC and Ellis Forensics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Johnson v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
