Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Mitchell v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Sara Elizabeth Hill, Catina R Drywater, Rachel Marie Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Parris, et al
as 23-5081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY BRYANT JONES, Attorney Cherokee Nation, individual capacity, ZACHARY STARKEY, Captain Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity, DETENTION OFFICER MALLOT, Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity and others
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Parris et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
John Everett Parris, Rachel Marie Dallis, Jeffery Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goff v. Dyer et al
as 1:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Goff
Defendant:
J Ross Dyer, John Everett Williams and Camille R. McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler #049345 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05452
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, Michael Minev, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
John Everett Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett v. Saad
as 1:2018cv00170
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad
Petitioner:
John Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wheeler v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv08081
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
John Everett Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Carr v. Jodie Snyder-Norri
as 17-5308
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN EVERETT CARR
Respondent - Appellee:
JODIE L. SNYDER-NORRIS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
