Cases 21 - 30 of 65
HENDERSON v JONES, et al
as 3:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
JOHN FITZGERALD HENDERSON, SR.
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, COLDPEPPER, RICHARD COMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson, Sr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01808
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Mr. Coldpepper, Richard Comerford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01528
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, Dr. Perez, Armour Corrections Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston v. USA
as 1:2015cv00880
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Coston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. John Legrand
as 15-6452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD LEGRAND
John Hawkins v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-40340
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD HAWKINS, also known as John F. Hawkins
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kiel v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02380
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Kiel
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiel v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00791
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Kiel
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZGERALD v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv04025
Petitioner:
JOHN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kokesh et al v. Obama et al
as 6:2014cv00159
Defendant:
John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Chester Alan Arthur and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Gumby and Adam Kokesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
