Cases 1 - 10 of 12
KERN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05990
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUTHRIE KERN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GUTHRIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12740
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUTHRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUTHRIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05761
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUTHRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lightsey v. Meigs et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Emma Lightsey
Defendant:
Jack Meigs, Donald McMillan, John Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Guthrie v. Prudential Insurance Co of Ame
as 14-3282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN GUTHRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AMERICA
KELLEY v. CASUCCIO et al
as 3:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E KELLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANGELO CASUCCIO, STACEY LYNN CASUCCIO and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
ROBERT E KELLEY
Intervenor_defendant:
John Guthrie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
GUTHRIE v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv07358
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUTHRIE
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
GUTHRIE v. ASTRUE et al
as 2:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUTHRIE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bass v. Lanoue et al
as 4:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mack Bass
Defendant:
Michael Lanoue, John Doe, John Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
