Cases 1 - 10 of 24
HUFF v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11791
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOHN HUFF and KEVIN J HUFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huff v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
John Huff
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huff v. SoClean, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
John Huff
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huff v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82330
Plaintiff:
John Huff
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Glaxosmithkline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huff v. Edmondson
as 7:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Amanda Brooke Edmondson
Plaintiff:
John Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wise v. East Grand Rapids Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2020cv01262
Defendant:
East Grand Rapids Department of Public Safety, Bethany Moore, Collin Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Wise
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
AGRI EXOTIC TRADING, INC. v. NORTH EAST RESTAURANT DIRECT, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv20284
Plaintiff:
AGRI EXOTIC TRADING, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN HUFF, RICHARD ROES 1-10, NORTH EAST RESTAURANT DIRECT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
AGRI EXOTIC TRADING, INC. v. NORTH EAST RESTAURANT DIRECT, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv20284
Plaintiff:
AGRI EXOTIC TRADING, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN HUFF, RICHARD ROES 1-10, NORTH EAST RESTAURANT DIRECT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hodges v. Galleghar et al
as 1:2020cv07640
Defendant:
Theresa Overbeek, John T Galleghar, Panetara and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrion S Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. Mahajan, M.D. et al
as 1:2020cv02499
Defendant:
Gary D. Cerasi, Creative Business Strategies, Inc., Sangeeta T. Mahajan, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
John Huff, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
