Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SMITH v. USA
as 2:2023cv00756
Petitioner:
JOHN MALCOLM SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hill v. Steele et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Labarron Dewayne Hall and LaBarron Dewayne Hill
Defendant:
William H. Steele, S. Mitcell McRae, John Malcolm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Johnny Caldwell
Defendant:
State of Utah, Ernest Timmons, John Malcolm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Bales et al
as 9:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gay Mims
Defendant:
John Malcolm Bales, Brittain Albert Featherston and John R Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Bales et al
as 3:2013cv03625
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gay Mims
Defendant:
John Malcolm Bales, Brittain Albert Featherston and John R Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frias v. Bales et al
as 4:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
Luis Rangel Frias
Defendant:
John Malcolm Bales, John Chastain, Phyllis J. Pyless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frias v. Bales et al
as 5:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Luis Rangel Frias
Defendant:
John Malcolm Bales, John Chastain, Phyllis J. Pyless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sorensen et al
as 4:2012cv03003
Defendant:
Lancaster County
All Defendants Are Sued In Their Individual And Official Capacity:
Lincoln/Lancaster County Police Division, John Malcolm, J. Sorensen and others
Plaintiff:
Tobin R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdejo Rodcha et al v. Landgrebe et al
as 9:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Verdejo Rodcha
Defendant:
Kenneth Landgrebe, Janet Napolitano, John Malcolm Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart v. Cruz
as 3:2010cv01687
Petitioner:
John Malcolm Stewart
Respondent:
Maureen Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
