Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ortiz-Kehoe #256263 v. Royster et al
as 1:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
John Ortiz-Kehoe #256263
Defendant:
Larry S. Royster and Julie Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv10412
Plaintiff:
John Ortiz
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. City of San Jose
as 5:2022cv07186
Plaintiff:
Mark Thompson, Rachelle Imus, Jeffrey P. Echivarov and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose, Sandra Murillo, Vanessa Barretta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42210
Plaintiff:
LIONEL JOHN ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jesse Washington et al v. Warden J. Gastelo et al
as 2:2021cv01309
Defendant:
Warden J. Gastelo, D. Gottesfeld and J. Bonnifield
Plaintiff:
John Lee, Blair Hays, Arthel Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. MDO, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01187
Defendant:
John Moreno and MDO, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santos-Alvarez v. Departamento de Correccion y Rehabilitacion et al
as 3:2020cv01029
Respondent:
Lieutenant II Wilfredo Berdecia, Julie Gomez-Gomez, John Ortiz-Vega and others
Petitioner:
Luis A Santos-Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. John Ortiz
as 19-16951
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ORTIZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ORTIZ v. FAN BISTRO RESTAURANT INC. et al
as 2:2018cv17437
Defendant:
FAN BISTRO RESTAURANT INC., FENG LIU and LENA LIU
Plaintiff:
JOHN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perkins v. Burnett et al
as 1:2018cv07706
Defendant:
C.O. H. Burnett, C.O. "John" Bryant, John and Jane Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Nayshawn Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
