Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Smith v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00563
Plaintiff:
John R. Smith, III
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Rubin Lublin, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Garrell Associates, Inc. v. Jack Smith Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Garrell Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Smith Companies, Inc. , John R. Smith , Tim Jones Custom Home Design and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Smith v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
John R. Smith
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Ron King, Raniece Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Sprint Communications Company, LP et. al.
as 6:2016cv00050
Defendant:
Nextel of Texas, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company, LP
Plaintiff:
John R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Smith v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01040
Plaintiff:
John R. Smith, III
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Smith v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.
as 1:2014cv03833
Plaintiff:
John R. Smith, III
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33956
Plaintiff:
Christina S. Smith and John R. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Smith
as 1:2013at00242
Defendant:
John R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
