Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rowe et al v. Chilla
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Rowe and Jeanne Rowe
Defendant:
Charles Chilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Malcolm v. Association of Supervisors and
as 21-2700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bernice Malcolm
Defendant / Appellee:
Association of Supervisors and Administrators of Rochester, ASAR, Timothy Cliby, President and Individually, John Rowe, Vice President and Individually and others
Rowe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06611
Plaintiff:
John Rowe and John T. Rowe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Maldonado v. Gunsett et al
as 1:2021cv03719
Defendant:
Officer John Gunsett, Jane Medbury and Sergant John Rowe
Plaintiff:
Edwin Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Chennette, et al v. Porch.com, Inc., et al
as 20-35962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE ROBB, NATHAN CHENNETTE, SCOTT GLUBAY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENTON MARRELLI, MATTHEW EHRLICHMAN, GOSMITH INC. and others
Rowe v. Dubber, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04507
Plaintiff:
John Rowe
Defendant:
Dubber, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31769
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10284
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chennette v. Porch.com et al
as 1:2020cv00201
Plaintiff:
Nick Miller, David Frost, Adam Byerley and others
Defendant:
GoSmith Inc., Brenton Marrelli, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
