Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Providence College
as 1:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Providence College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. DIY Pole Barns & Supplies, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02665
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
DIY Pole Barns & Supplies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarks v. Private Money Goldmine et al
as 8:2019cv01014
Defendant:
FM 41, Inc., Private Money Goldmine, John Douglas Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Henry James Clarks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Brown University in Providence in the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
as 1:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Brown University in Providence in the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Smith et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Victoria Smith and John Smith
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. , Ray Brandt Nissan, Inc. and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DIELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07263
Plaintiff:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DIELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , JOHN DOE (1-5) and JOHN SMITH, INC. (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Howard
as 5:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Bobby Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosemann v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Rosemann
Defendant:
Derek John Smith and Distinctive Properties Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
The Liteman Electric Company, Inc. et al v. McBride & Son Homes, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00477
Plaintiff:
The Liteman Electric Company, Inc., John Smith and Jeff Byrley
Defendant:
McBride & Son Homes, Inc. and McBride & Son Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
