Cases 1 - 10 of 28
MANN v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2024cv09715
Defendant:
MARIO VIERA, PATRICIA MCGILL, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-8 OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, Lisa Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1541
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellison v. Umatilla County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ellison
Defendant:
Umatilla County Jail, NP Michelle Davies and John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poux v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv09368
Plaintiff:
Nancy Poux
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpole v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jackson Harpole
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Collette Peters, Erin Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Warren et al
as 6:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Nathan Warren and John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baybury v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
Abdul Baybury
Defendant:
City of New York, Charles Barhold and John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adcock v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 3:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jasper Adcock
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.