Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fusco v. Westchester County Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv01943
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Fusco
Defendant:
Westchester County Department of Corrections, County of Dutchess, Nory Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Russell Crain, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Mikesell and George Thomas Lee Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Stirling et al
as 9:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Jonathan Lane, Laura Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. MCGINETLY et al
as 2:2017cv02113
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LANE
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINETLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Halbrook v. Barber et al
as 4:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Halbrook
Defendant:
Tyler Barber, Sandy Huckabee, John Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane-Woodstock v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lane-Woodstock
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Brandon Shaffer, Linda Lucero-Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodstock v. Larimer County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jonathan (Lane) Woodstock
Defendant:
Larimer County Sheriff, S. Shaffer, Bret Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LANE v. KINNANE et al
as 1:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LANE
Defendant:
VINCENT KINNANE and ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
