Cases 11 - 20 of 406
Bernard Madoff, et al v. Joe Arpaio, et al
as 10-16664
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MADOFF and JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON and DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff, IRVING H. PICARD, FRANK DIPASCAL and others
Sutyagin et al v. Hamdan et al
as 3:2010cv00440
Defendant:
Salim Ahmed Hamdan
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Igor Sutyagin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shahzad et al v. Jerusalem Post, et al
as 3:2010cv00384
Defendant:
Jerusalem Post
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Faisal Shahzad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Abdulmutallab et al.
as 9:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdulmutallab et al v. ABC's Dancing With The Stars et al
as 4:2010cv00191
Plaintiff:
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
ABC's Dancing With The Stars, Nicole Scherzinger, Derek Hough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madoff et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01747
Plaintiff:
Bernard Madoff and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, Irving H Picard, Frank Dipascal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Paquiao et al
as 3:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Manny Paquiao, Freddie Roach, Shane Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riches v. American Curves Magazine et al
as 4:2009cv00369
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
American Curves Magazine, Robert Kennedy, Comag Marketing Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Roberts
as 6:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
John Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
