Cases 1 - 10 of 19
RANDALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16772
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN RANDALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walters v. City of Palm Bay, Florida
as 6:2021cv01651
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Walters
Defendant:
City of Palm Bay, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. City of Melbourne, Florida
as 6:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Walters
Defendant:
City of Melbourne, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. State of New Mexico
as 6:2021cv01510
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Walters
Defendant:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Dahlem et al
as 2:2020cv02089
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Doyle
Defendant:
Deputy Rick Dahlem, Sergeant Dennis Shores, Officer B.D. Kimmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel et al v. Willms et al
as 2:2019cv05139
Plaintiff:
Piyushkumar Patel and Dipikaben Piyushkumar Patel
Defendant:
Jonathan Randall Willms and Sun Life Family Health Center Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scarberry v. United States Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Jonathan Randall, United States Department of the Air Force and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kendra Scarberry
Petitioner:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Scarberry v. Randall et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ms Kendra Scarberry
Defendant:
Jonathan Randall, United States Department of the Air Force and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Love v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv10081
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Love
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Commander of Monroe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curshen v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv24718
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Curshen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
