Cases 41 - 50 of 7,595
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward et al v. Brown et al
as 8:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Carrie M. Ward, Howard N. Bierman, Jacob Geesing and others
Defendant:
Andrena C. Brown and Dennis M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Baltimore City Sheriff's Department, et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jermaine Carlton Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02050
Petitioner:
Hadie Markeith Jones
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of West Virginia v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Emmanuel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
