Cases 31 - 40 of 4,817
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M Jones, Stephanie Jones and Diane Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. West Bend Mutual Insurance
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
West Bend Mutual Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Marcus Jones v. United States
as 24-1361
Petitioner:
Marcus Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Coffel Construction, LLC
as 4:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund, Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund, Greater Kansas City Laborers Vacation Plan and others
Defendant:
Coffel Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Roddy Sweet, Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Nina Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
bin Bey v. Brock et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dreke bin Bey
Defendant:
Steve Brock, Chandra Jones and Tammy Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
