Cases 31 - 40 of 11,957
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
JONES et al v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01703
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, SILVERSCRIPT INSURANCE COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE ELAYNE JONES and MARILYN A. MANZI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Arthur Jones
as 24-1351
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Human v. International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO) et al
as 4:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO), International Union of Police Associations doing business as National Police and Troopers Association and Jone Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones v. Jones
as 8:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Sueanna G. Jones
Defendant:
Titus L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Chesapeake Bank v. Jones, et al.
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stella Gale Jones, Perfect Touch Innovations, LLC and Valley Communities Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
