Cases 11 - 20 of 180
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez Castro v. One Nevada Credit Union
as 2:2022cv01563
Plaintiff:
Jorge Hernandez Castro
Defendant:
One Nevada Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rodney Adams v. Riverside County Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv01636
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adams
Defendant:
Riverside County Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility, Stan Lee, Jorge Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Hernandez v. USA
as 22-12655
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RIVERA v. USA
as 1:2022cv00524
Petitioner:
JORGE HERNANDEZ RIVERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Campuzano v. BHZ, LLC d.b.a. Black Oak Tavern et al
as 1:2022cv03356
Plaintiff:
Jorge Hernandez Campuzano
Defendant:
BHZ, LLC d.b.a. Black Oak Tavern, Patrick O'Keefe, Dave McCarthy and others
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06721
Plaintiff:
JORGE HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Camacho v. Hernandez-Delgado et al
as 1:2022cv01717
Plaintiff:
Gil Camacho
Defendant:
Jorge Hernandez-Delgado and MTLR Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Travelers Insurance Company v. Fernandez-Gonzalez et al
as 2:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Travelers Insurance Company
Defendant:
Julio Fernandez-Gonzalez, Errodys Carrillo-Diaz, Jorge Hernandez-Roque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Jorge Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3120
Petitioner:
JORGE HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
