Cases 1 - 10 of 20
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Centeno-Ramirez De Carrera, et al v. Garland
as 23-9580
Petitioner:
SULMA YESENIA CENTENO-RAMIREZ DE CARRERA and MIA JOSE CARRERA-CENTENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Centeno v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08365
Plaintiff:
Jose A Centeno
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez et al v. Paul Newman Dazzling Detailing, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Perez, Jose A. Centeno and Kevin A. Centeno
Defendant:
Paul Newman Dazzling Detailing, Inc. and Paul Newman
Zahareas v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv03423
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven Zahareas
Defendant:
Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Brendan F. Kelley, Jeffrey Yenchko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Barajas Centeno et al v. City of Carlsbad et al
as 3:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Jose Barajas Centeno and Jean Wortham
Defendant:
City of Carlsbad, Mickey Williams, Matt Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Centeno-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 22-1681
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO CENTENO-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jimenez Centeno v. Garland
as 22-581
Petitioner:
JOSE JIMENEZ CENTENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
K. et al v. Sonoma County et al
as 3:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE K., P. K., KAYA K. and others
Defendant:
Sonoma County, JOSE A. CENTENO, GINA M. CENTENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
