Cases 1 - 10 of 267
Safeway Insurance Company v. Jose Baudillo Morales-Castillo et al
as 2:2024cv04725
Plaintiff:
Safeway Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jose Baudillo Morales-Castillo, Francisco Apolinar Grande and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
USA v. Morales-Huerta
as 24-10010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Morales-Huerta
USA v. Morales-Huerta
as 24-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Morales-Huerta, also known as Jesus Ariciaga
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Alvarado Morales v. Garland
as 23-360
Petitioner:
OSCAR JOSE ALVARADO MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales v. Singh et al
as 4:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Commercial Jose Litigation and Fernando Jose Ramirez Morales
Defendant:
Manider Singh and Chahal Ontime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Vasquez et al v. Staff Support Team et al
as 1:2022cv03468
Plaintiff:
Krystal Vasquez, Maria de Pilar Espinoza Vera, Jose Guillermo Medrano Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Staff Support Team, Mack Management Group LLC, Mack Cat Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jose Morales Godinez v. Levi Morales Godinez
as 23-2194
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE LUIS MORALES GODINEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
LEVI HELEM MORALES GODINEZ
Rosales-Morales v. USA
as 4:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Julio Enrique Jose Rosales-Morales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Deleon-Morales v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Jose Deleon-Morales
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
