Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Romero v. Stammitti et al.
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Phil R. Stammitti, Deputy Sheriff Shea Adkisson, Deputy Sheriff K9 Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Romero
as 24-1702
Defendant:
JOSE BALMORE ROMERO and Porky
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romero-Bonilla v. Ping
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jose J. Romero Ronilla and Jose J. Romero-Bonilla
Defendant:
Warden L. Ping
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Romero-Mendoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1089
Petitioner:
JOSE MEDARDO ROMERO-MENDOZA, YASMYN NOHEMY FLORES-HERNANDEZ and KEILA YULEIDY ROMERO-FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Romero-Lozano v. Garland
as 23-60638
Petitioner:
Jose Ernesto Romero-Lozano
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Romero Lopez v. Garland
as 23-3863
Petitioner:
JOSE ALFREDO ROMERO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13210
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARDENAS ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04627
Plaintiff:
JOSE GUSTAVO ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero v. SN Servicing Corporation et al
as 8:2023cv02354
Plaintiff:
JOSE V. ROMERO
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC d/b/a RIGHTPATH SERVICING, COMMUNITY LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
