Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Frank Fuentes v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1165
Petitioner:
FRANK EDGARDO PALACIO FUENTES, a/k/a Francis Edgardo Palacios Fuentes, a/k/a Jose Antonio Rivera-Adame, a/k/a Jose Luis Estrada-Contreas, a/k/a Jose Alfredo Contreras-Salinas
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Rivera-Nazario
as 21-1597
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RIVERA-NAZARIO
Rivera v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rivera, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01640
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rivera, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Rivera-Palma et al
as 3:2017cv01421
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Rivera-Palma, Luisa Ines Colon-Cebollero and Conjugal Legal Partnership Rivera-Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jose Rivera-Porra
as 17-40294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RIVERA-PORRAS
Shane Burnett v. Home Depot USA, Inc., et al
as 16-13434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC., DAVID CASANOVA and JOSE ANTONIO RIVERA ROJAS
Burnett v. HOME DEPOT USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22447
Plaintiff:
Shane Burnett
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, Inc. , David Casanova and Jose Antonio Rivera Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Rivera-Acevedo et al
as 3:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Rivera-Acevedo, Rosa Maria Arroyo-Ramos and Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUINONES v. HARLOW et al
as 5:2013cv05071
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO RIVERA QUINONES
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
